[x]

deviantART

 

LOL TREE HUGGAH!

Fri Jul 25, 2008, 6:02 AM
So Kil and I drove out into the desert tonight. We walked around with the dog, and cruched over the sun-scorched, and cracked earth. The sun warmed the air and lit up the alkali flats, something I missed seeing terribly. After we had our fill of fun (and after the dog had run herself to sleep), we traveled down the road some more. On our way back, we pulled over and huddled under the stars. I saw two things I had really missed seeing, the milky way, and stars in general. Kil had never seen the first, and did not know that stars can actually twinkle and wink like excited fireflies. We got to talking about why the sky is so obscured in many areas. The air and light pollution is enough in some places to completely blot out the night's majesty. We talked about a book I really should read, "Desert Solitaire", and how it echoed our thoughts about the struggle of conservation against human memory. He had read the book in his English class, and his professor had talked about teaching over in a smoggy city. When attempting to describe a rainbow to the kids in his class, he had to say, "well, you know how sometimes oil floats on top of puddles? That is what it looks like". How can you describe such simple beauty to those who haven't seen it? Not very well unfortunately.

That also got me thinking about a basic tally in my head. Let's see:

Baiji River Dolphin: Possibly extinct (recently)
Vietnam Leaf-Nosed Bat: Possibly extinct
Amur Leopard: 35 wild individuals
Yangtze Giant Soft-Shell Turtle: About four individuals (Captive and Wild)
Crested Shelduck: If still alive, about 50 individuals
Asiatic Cheetah: 50-60 individuals
Florida Panther: Less than 100 individuals
Humans: 6.8 BILLION individuals

Hmm.

I've actually had to set my Asian comic back a few decades, just to get some level of biodiversity in there. That's really sad. Pathetic actually. And I've heard the few people who even know of the river dolphin's extinction place the blame solely on China. Hrm, and who outsources to the factories that are causing massive pollution in the Yangtze river? Ohhhh, oops. We didn't want to think of that, eh? The sooner people accept that everyone is in this together, and the sooner people stop causing problems en masse, the sooner people can start working on more solutions together.

Of course, you have to believe that there is a problem first. The attitude many people take about the environment echoes an article I read about a very active fault line in CA. The people who lived along it were asked what they thought of being in close proximity to something that was liable to cause widespread death in a short ammount of time. The response was summed up in one woman's reply, which was something to the effect of, "oh, that? I try not to think about that. *Giggle*". This in turn, reminds me of the quote (Kurt Vonnegut I believe), which went something like, "and each generation builds along the fault lines, creating their own natural disasters". Indeed. There are the equally disheartening replies of, "well, it is sad...but that is just how things are". Pray tell, exactly why are they that way?

I was at the zoo about two weeks ago, and a woman pointed to the amur leopard and said, "that's a bengal tiger". She refused to believe her boyfriend's claims that she might be mistaken. That was a twenty something year-old, and not an uncommon type of statement to hear at a zoo. Did this person miss out on the little kiddy book where you point to the animal that is huge, orange and striped, and your mommy tells you it is a tiger with a "T"? I don't expect people to know a white rhino from a black rhino, or even a rabbit from a hare, but seriously...a tiger and a leopard? One has stripes, the other spots. The absolute lack of and disregard for basic animal knowledge (say nothing of the world outside of mammals), is completely disheartening. You learn a ton of equations in school that most teacher's admit you will never use within your lifetime once you leave high school....but you don't even know what a tiger is when you graduate? People can't be expected to worry about rapidly disappearing species if they don't even know what they are. And who knows what the greatest overall threat to species worldwide is? I hear "hunting" most often. What I don't often hear is "loss of habitat". This can be due to things like pollution, "patchworking", and land development, but whatever the cause, loss of land (and water) is a huge threat that needs serious attention. One of the most effective types of conservation societies are those that buy up land and place protective restrictions on it. Why? Because it doesn't just help out the poster kids like gray wolves and giant pandas. It helps everyone, be it plant, amphibian, mammal, bird...or, ultimately, human. And what does all the land loss, pollution, and so forth really add up to? Could it be the thing no one wishes to even discuss? Too many fucking people and an ever increasing global population? Nah. *giggle* Let's talk about something else.

Well, I hope to see more environment-related education, and a whole hell of a lot less ignorance and denial (I find money has a way of spinning issues and blinding eyes as well). On the way home, Kil and I lost sight of the stars as we neared the city. The moon followed us the whole way back very faithfully. I hope it too won't be stricken from the sky, leaving me to describe it to future generations as, "a big, glowing ball that was sometimes a sliver. Sort of like a shiny quarter, or a fingernail clipping". Mmm, lovely.

  • Listening to: http://youtube.com/watch?v=2C52wsxuZT0

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

Speaking of money, some conservationists have begun advocating natural resources not as something that should never be touched or tainted, but as something to be preserved for the actual economic value of the area. Like wetlands as buffers for hurricanes, or parks as places where tourists come to see natural wonders. This tends to speak more to businesses, governments, and poor, 3rd world populations than speeches about ethics and the wonder of biodiversity. Additionally, it seems preserving the Earth and using its resources consummately rather than blowing them away with unrestrained, unconcerned consumption is economically a smarter and more profitable long term plan. Drilling in the Arctic and Gulf of Mexico might seem like a good idea in the short term, but we'd still be dependent on energy sources where one bad hurricane or a really bad freeze could shut down operations (witness Hurricane Katrina and the resulting fiasco). By using alternative forms of energy, not only do we limit our carbon footprint, but also diversify our energy portfolio [like we do with stocks] and thus find ourselves less vulnerable if one or more sources of energy (like oil, currently) is upset by wars, natural disasters, or economic stupidity. And saving money to boot. Conservation needn't be ignorant to the needs of humanity, but compliment it. And the more educated we become about our world and our impact on it, the more we realize how necessary conservation is.
Aye, more and more conservation agencies are working with big businesses to try to limit the damage they do. Eco-tourism also has its benefits (though it has drawbacks as well). Unfortunately though, as long as the voice of money vastly outwieghs responsibility and a sense of connectedness, I don't really see things ending up peachy myself. Money changes value, and people seem easily swayed as to what benefits them.
Unfortunately, many third world countries are pretty screwed over right now in many ways. It irks me when people blame, say, a poverty stricken band of native people forced to live on a reservation for not looking after a rapidly disapearing species (especially when we aren't doing a great job of looking after our own environment here in the US). They are busy trying to live. There was a very striking panel in the graphic novel, "Deogratias", that showed US tourists standing under a huge 'Save the Pandas' banner while Rwandans hacked each-other to pieces outside with machetes. A rare species of frog isn't going to mean squat to someone who is living in a Hellish environment. And as people have shown time and time again, the slaughter of a large group of people will be allowed unless stopping it benefits a nation that has the means to put an end to it. While the monetary and the moral can work together, I do not hold much hope in relying on money alone. :/
Aye, I agree whole-heartedly about responsible energy consumption. The fact that I still see articles in well-known magazines that publish "paid/fake science" articles with statements such as, "so called pollution from these smoke stacks is actually completely harmless and beneficial to the environment", depresses me to no end. I can only hope that people will take a little more pride in belonging to such a complex and beautful system that is the world.
It has always amazed me how many people can't get their animals straight at zoos... and there's a sign right there in front of them... I hear it constantly while I'm sitting there sketching. My favorite of all time was "Look at the wolves mom!" "No honey, those are foxes, wolves are a lot bigger" while looking at a wolf that was about 130 lbs. Shit, how big did she think wolves were?!
Lol, I don't think I've seen those fake science articles, or perhaps they've simply escaped my notice. What cracks me up is the hilariously skewed gas and oil company commercials that wave the american flay around and show a bunch of farmers, basic all-american imagery (the kind you commonly see on campaign ads for politicians with little to say other than appealing to your emotions and patriotic pride), and claim "oh we're for America! We're all America rah rah!" I feel like yelling at the screen to explain the brutal, bloody wars and environmental devastation centering around their product. Not to mention I'm skeptical of any oil company claiming they are seriously investing in alternative energy sources when it means abandoning the very reason for their business's existence, or severely limiting it.
Deogratias, eh? I oughta look that up.
"When attempting to describe a rainbow to the kids in his class, he had to say, "well, you know how sometimes oil floats on top of puddles? That is what it looks like"."

That shocked me the most out of this journal. And upset me a little. Possibly because I've never lived in a city. I see the stars and the moon outside my window every night, and see the rainbow over the horizon when there is one. I guess it's one of those things you begin to take for granted when you live in a fairly rural area. I mean, I've been to London a few times, and each time it shocks me at the amount of pollution there is. On a perfectly warm day, that was apparently sunny everywhere else, I couldn't see the sun or even the blue sky anywhere.

I'm a bit anxious about saying any more about an issue that I hardly know anything about, so I'll leave it at that ^^;
Haha! FLAGS! Whenever someone whips out a flag these days, I know they are trying to sell me something. XD

I think you would really enjoy it. Depressing though it is, it was one of my favorite gifts that I have ever recieved. Without giving anything away, the story is brutally realistic, and it is blended with the artist's masterful depiction of one man's surreal madness. I don't think I've ever read a comic so haunting before. This page has an excellent sampling of the art: [link] and the disturbing blend of man and "dog". I would strongly suggest renting and watching "Ghosts of Rwanda" first, as it does an excellent job covering the massacre, and explaining some of the politics behind it. The clip of the US politicians gingerly stepping over the tortured and burned carcasses, and making an empty promise that they would never again stand by and do nothing...is emotionally overwhelming to say the least.
Oh my! Man, I'd hate to run into whatever she thought a wolf was. XD I hear you about the signs. The often large and sometimes flashing signs. Not sure why they are ignored so much. I was just at a small zoo in VA, and the parents were literally dragging their kids through the grounds without even pausing in front of the cages, yelling at them that "they didn't have time to dilly dally", and completely ignoring the children's interest in the animals that were wizzing past. Why even bother going if you aren't even going to look at the animals? Totally boggles my mind.
Honestly, it shocked me too, as well as the fact that I had forgotten how many stars are supposed to be in the sky after six years of not seeing them. :/ I've always heard of programs that do things like take city kids out to see what cows are and to show them that milk doesn't come from a grocery store, but rainbows are something I took for granted too. Which is another struggle with conservation. Things aren't is bad in some areas as others, and it is hard for someone who sees untouched land and a healthy ammount of wildlife on a daily basis to imagine some of the effects a dense human population has elsewhere, especially when the people in a largely affected area don't know what it is that is missing.

And please don't feel anxious here. Each person only knows a tiny fraction of what there is to know. Talking about what is on our minds allows us to explore topics and expand upon them. :)
I couldn't agree with you more.

I was a teacher for a semester last year, trying to teach science to high school freshmen. Me being fresh out of grad school with an environmental science degree, I though the kids would be eager to learn about ways to make some solid changes in how things are done. I figured what kid wouldn't enjoy the idea of fixing something the "dumb adults" have done. Or even just wanting to make the world a better place.

Instead I ran into a veritable wall of apathy. They didn't care about anything except plugging into their iPods, playing Xboxes, and following latest fashion trends. It was heartbreaking. I spent many trips home literally in tears.

And I'm not saying apathy because they were smart enough to just get by without effort.. These were 9th grade kids who lived in a hurricane prone area but didn't know what a hurricane WAS other than an excuse for a day off. I had students who thought the sun was a planet, who thought amphibians were "lizards," kids who couldn't spell the word "friction," and the vast majority lacked the math skills to do simple multiplication and division without a calculator. And this was all AFTER the lessons. I think most 5-year-olds could process information better than these kids.

I don't know what the solution is, but we really, really need to start making people realize that this isn't just some joke. Their precious game systems and fancy cell phones will go away in a big hurry if we can't figure out how to moderate our species' energy usage. We can't keep pretending nothing is wrong, and then whining about it when problems start to spring up. :(

--
"One raindrop raises the sea."
I had a professor, actually, who had ideas very much like what you're describing.

He said that economics itself has to literally be re-thought to incorporate the costs involved with any kind of environmental issues and natural resources. He wanted to assign monetary values to everything from the initial raw materials, to the emissions after, even the cost to the local ecosystem for -removing- the raw materials in the first place.

I think it'd be a great step in the right direction. Unfortunately his views are strongly in the minority at the moment. But the more people who know and support this mentality, the better!

--
"One raindrop raises the sea."

Journal History

Site Map